TVSeriesFinale.com wrote:

I think we'll see the rest of the season's episodes but I have my doubts about a second season.

posted at February 14, 2007 07:23 PM

Dottie wrote:

I think Studio 60 is one of the BEST shows on TV this season. Amazing actors, creative storylines and intelligent without being condescending.
Matthew Perry is at his best and I adore Timothy Busfield. Amanda Peet, although not a favorite of mine, I love her as Jordan.
Sure, there may be some minor problems, but I think the writers and actors deserve to continue. I think it can only get better!

posted at February 14, 2007 11:31 PM

Kevin Gillman wrote:

well I guess I could say I saw this coming and Monday night was not a good episode, but still this does not look good. I enjoy the show I record it every week and watch it. I hope NBC decides to keep this show at least until the season is over with.

posted at February 14, 2007 11:41 PM

Amy wrote:

I am about to quit watching t.v. all together. They keep removing good shows. They better not remove Studio 60. It is such a smart show and humor. But yet stupid shows stay on. It doesn't make sense to me that they quit a show because there is only 2 or 3 million people watching. That seems like a lot of people to me.

posted at February 15, 2007 07:17 AM

Patrick wrote:

First and foremost, Sorkin and Schlamme are about as good duo as there have ever been. It is a shame that a great show like Studio 60 gets the axe because its audience is to ineffectual to keep up with the show. What does it mean when in order for a show to succeed it has to play down expectations so the audience will get it? Take the high road Aaron and Thomas and you shall succeed I say! I will miss Studio 60, especially Bradley Whitford whom I feel is an extremely gifted actor, and it's witty and inquisitive story lines. I can only hope and pray Sorkin and Schlamme hook up for another series in the very near future. Bon Voyage Studio 60. Time to break out the West Wing DVD's.

posted at February 15, 2007 03:15 PM

Megan wrote:

I think I'm going to cry. Isn't Studio 60 the number one TIVO'd show in the country? I know it's high on the shows on itunes... Does that count for nothing? PLEASE BRAVO, pick up Studio 60 for those of us with ACTUAL taste!

From what I've seen of it, I'll be shocked and a little scared if the Black Donally's actually make it.

posted at February 15, 2007 03:55 PM

NoMoreStudio60! wrote:

Come on people, stop being so pretentious! This is a DOG of a show, a Dog with FLEAS; in fact, an EXPENSIVE Dog with Fleas! This isnt a comedy, but a pretty woeful drama to boot, so what the hell is it supposed to be? A lame attempt to rip-off Sorkin's own West Wing combined with the TV aspect of Sports Night, to make a completely unwatchable mess! My son has begged me to continue watching this tripe, and for the sake of my kid, I have, but god, does this suck! And hallejulah, its going off next week! Hey people, dont hold your breath for its return! Waste of talent, abuse of age-old sitcom cliches, and plots that go nowhere fast! And, to top it off, that Sarah Paulson has got to be the least funniest actress Ive ever had the displeasure of seeing! Good Riddens to Bad Rubbish!

posted at February 15, 2007 04:18 PM

Stacey wrote:

I like Studio 60 - I wouldn't say it's the best show on TV, but I do record it each week and enjoy it. I think it could grow tremendously. I like it a whole lot better than 30 Rock and some other shows on these days.

posted at February 15, 2007 04:34 PM

Kearn wrote:

I'm sick of cancelled shows that have potential. In the last few years many good shows have gone the way of the dodo, because ratings did not put them in the top 10 shows of the evening. It would be a shame to lose another good show such as Studio 60. It is a well written show with good characters. I think it is worth watching if you haven't seen it.

posted at February 15, 2007 08:47 PM

Melody wrote:

Ouch! Studio 60 was created by the same Genius as West Wing! This has become one of the two shows I watch weekly, the other being House. I don't care which night they change it to, I'm following it with loyalty!

posted at February 15, 2007 09:54 PM

char wrote:

Yeah. I like this show and all, but good god, it's gotten ugly stupid. At first the sketch comedy was problematically bad, now I'm just groaning at the lack of chemistry between Paulson and Perry. That's the big relationship? It's like trying to make bologna and cheese interesting. And how creepy is the seduction of Jordan? Ugh. It's rushed and rudimentary, and worse yet, it honestly is condescending. I wanted to love it. There are many things I do love about it, but... the past few eps have made me grind my teeth in how inorganic they are. As much as I may want to care about Harriet? I just spend every ep wishing she'd contract some dread disease so Albie could do something interesting. Just ugh.

posted at February 16, 2007 01:43 AM

Will wrote:

It has all the trappings of intelligence, but it's not all that intelligent. First we were asked to believe the show-within-the-show was mind-blowing sketch comedy, but all the skits we saw sucked. Then we were asked to believe it was biting social commentary, but name-dropping hot topics and beating around strawmen isn't the same as discussing stuff. Finally, we were asked to believe that all along it was a romantic comedy, even though not a single person in the two main pairings is believable or even likable.

Good riddance. Maybe next time Sorkin will write a TV show instead of therapeutic wank.

posted at February 16, 2007 01:47 AM

Charlotte wrote:

I unfortunately have not been able to tune into this show as much as I had hoped... which really does suck for me. I do love the show and I do wish I could watch weekly and there is no way that I want this to go down. I'm wondering if moving it to a different time slot... or maybe the same time slot on a different day would be beneficial.

posted at February 16, 2007 05:46 PM

Suncho wrote:

Dang. It's my favorite show.

posted at February 16, 2007 06:04 PM

Mark wrote:

This show is a disappointment. Sorkin is a brilliant writer, and I love the cast, but it seems to me that the tone of the show is way too serious. The show takes itself way to seriously for it's own good. This isn't the White House, this is a weekly sketch comedy show that they are running. With "Sports Night", Sorkin understood his subject matter. Here I would like to see a show pretense, or faux skit, that was actually funny. (See 30 Rock for that.)Let's back off the fundamental Christian sub-plot, and lighten up. Matthew Perry is a terrific comedic actor...turn him loose!

posted at February 17, 2007 11:32 AM

Doyle wrote:

The 2/14 show got it's lowest ratings? Uh, Valentine's Day ... hello?! People were likely distracted with other activities during that timeslot. I agree that S60 is one of the smartest and entertaining shows on television. NBC would be galactically stupid to pull this show. Well, I guess it wouldn't be the first time. But when it finally dawns on the 'powers that be' that people are actually able to use their DVRs/VCRs so that they can come back to the show at some other convenient time to watch maybe they will minimize the mistakes in the future. We can only hope. NBC: If you do replace it make sure it's with another Law & Order: TSOC (The Same Old Crap). Nothing says ratings like passing out in front of the television from extreme repetition. But I'm not bitter!!! :) Later Gang!

posted at February 18, 2007 01:14 AM

bob wrote:

Its about time this waste of electricity has finally been pulled. It, along with 30 rock, it simply one of the worst, most base series on television today. It is intolerance at its worst, demeaning any group of people who aren't in the 'approved' paradigm of Sorkin. Hollywood definitely needs to become more tolerant, and it needs to develop more quality series, instead of the dredge that was this show.

posted at February 18, 2007 10:27 AM

No No No wrote:

This is my new Fav show. C'mon, dont take this away from me too please!

posted at February 19, 2007 11:52 AM

kathy wrote:

I really wanted to like this show and the early eps showed promise, but it just gets worse and worse. Matt and Danny are such jackasses - are we supposed to like these guys? The women are treated like idiots who don't know what they want until some guy tells them. And yes, we get it, Harriett is a conservo-Christian. Tired. I'd like to see the focus switch to Simon, who is actually complex & interesting. But This show needs to go away and free up these actors to do something better.

posted at February 19, 2007 11:54 AM

D Paulic wrote:

I love Studio 60. It is smart, funny, touching, and fast paced. Don't take it away!!! I love it because you have to be awake to watch it and keep up with the dialogue. It is so nice to have something that is above 3rd grade level!! It reminds me of West Wing and Gilmore Girls in the fast pace and multiple story lines.

posted at February 19, 2007 04:49 PM

nina wrote:

No FREAKING way should they cancel Studio 60! It's the smartest show they've had (amongst the billion or so "reality" game shows. ugh!) since friends. sorry if the more intellegent of us aren't as large a portion of the populous as one would hope, but please, NBC, don't take away one of our only satisfying bits of entertainment!

posted at February 19, 2007 06:55 PM

steph wrote:

Studio 60 is the best show! It is a smart show! It is on the wrong night! They need to move it to Thursday night in place of ER.

posted at February 19, 2007 10:30 PM

Bobby wrote:

While I want to love Studio 60, it has too many good and bad episodes. There are episodes like Nevada day which suck, and then ones like The Christmas Episode which rock your socks off. I think if a little more time was put into writing each episode, it could be amazing. But when the kicker lines are "I'm crazy about you!" there clearly is something wrong. If it goes I'll be sad, but if it stays it needs to be more consistent (hopefully the good kind of consistent).

posted at February 19, 2007 11:41 PM

Rose L. wrote:

I'm so sad to hear (though not surprised) that this show is about to be pulled. Like Sports Night before it, any show that has a lot of sharp, witty and pointed dialog seems to vanish before it's had a real chance to work its magic on a larger portion of the TV watching population.

posted at February 19, 2007 11:54 PM

Jackie wrote:

I will be sorely disappointed if they cancel this show. The development of all of the characters, the superior acting by all, and the writing! This show is one of the best that has come out this season.

posted at February 20, 2007 12:08 AM

Dave wrote:

Simple. Most of America tunes in for Heroes, then as soon as it's over they watch their TiVo'ed 24 (or vice-versa). Heroes is a horrible lead-in for this show, because the target audience is completely different. I agree with the suggestion above that it should be in ER's time-slot. That spot already has a loyal following of fans who schedule their week around it and would also be attracted to this show's style.

Anyway, because I'm a Heroes/24 fan I watched the first episode of this show then decided it wasn't good enough to add to the already painfully long list of shows I'm following.

posted at February 20, 2007 11:44 AM

mkskippy24 wrote:

Well... it's good to see america (known for it's ignorance)comes through at the end and proves once again what every other nation says about us is true. (With the help of NoMoreStudio60's comment, and how witty your username is as well....) Unfortunately for the minority of us... the majority of this nation cannot understand the wit and humor of this quality show. A show that doesn't rely on "potty humor" or slapsick to get people to tune in every week. I think Studio 60 has been rather brillant (although a little less romance would be ok) and more original than any other sitcom that has debuted in a long time. I for one believe it is a travisty that those ignorant to intelligent humor get to decide on what the rest of us have to watch.

I can only hope there will be a station willing to pick up such a gem.... and allow us who want more than "Til Death" humor a place to go and intelligently enjoy TV...... Maybe a petition would help....????

posted at February 20, 2007 11:58 AM

Stacie wrote:

After another boring episode, I finally cancelled my Studio 60 Season Pass on Tivo. There is just nothing to like about any of the characters. Turn to Channel 7 next Monday night...What About Brian may not be the most intelligent show on the air, but at least it's entertaining.

posted at February 20, 2007 01:06 PM

DB wrote:

I love this show, and hope it still manages to find an audience that understands it and stays on the air. It's easily the best show on TV, and the only show on TV that I watch habitually every episode. And let me say, I have no idea where people get that the skits of the show within the show aren't funny, I've found most of unbelievably hilarous. The only that weren't were the ones that weren't extremely funny on purpose, like "Jenny doesn't have a baby," which naturally got slaughtered. Besides the show isn't about the skits they write, it's about the people making the show. The people who tuned in looking for an L.A. version of SNL missed the show completely. For the rest of us, who get it, and if NBC gave the show a decent enough backing, the future-evergrowing people who get it, it should stay on the air. Here's hoping NBC still has a little sense left.

posted at February 20, 2007 03:50 PM

Kate wrote:

Studio Sixty quickly became my favorite show on television and it would extremely disappointing to see it go. The characters are fantastic and the story lines have been entertaining and interesting. Hopefully NBC will remember "Scrubs" and "Seinfeld" which both started off weak, only to become two of the most popular shows on TV

posted at February 20, 2007 04:18 PM

Erika wrote:

This show hasn't been consistent, but when it's good, you see the potential. Studio 60 deserves the time it needs to develop into a great show. This week's episode was so much better than the last few. NBC would be making a huge mistake if it didn't nurture this genius in the making.

posted at February 20, 2007 05:59 PM

Suncho wrote:

There's a save Studio 60 petition out there:

http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/Save-NBC-Studio-60

It's only got a couple thousand signatures so far, but I think they just put it up yesterday or the day before.

posted at February 20, 2007 07:14 PM

stubbysfears wrote:

Maybe not the BEST show on TV, but clearly one of them. Most of the good shows on TV have long since "jumped the shark" (i.e. 24). With NBCs lineup of "Law and Order" and "Deal Or No Deal," they need this show.

Those who complain the sketches are lame haven't watched SNL lately. Is there a less entertaining show on the air than SNL? I know I can't sit through it.

All Studio 60 needs is a second season. If they can't fully hit their stride then, well, maybe you pull the plug. But not yet.

Someone please rescue this show.

posted at February 20, 2007 07:41 PM

Scott Woelfel wrote:

I'm as big a Sorkin fan as anyone but can he possibly be so tone deaf that he doesn't realize how lame the Matt/Harry relationship is. Matthew Perry, who will never be mistaken for Laurence Olivier, appears to be acting in a different show than Sarah Paulson. And I mean that as a compliment. He's that much better than she is. I don't know how anyone could think that a smart guy like Matt would see anything in Harry.

posted at February 20, 2007 09:10 PM

Valsadie wrote:

In the pilot, it seemed that its writer had a grudge against TV creators--the people who are taking the practice and art of TV and chucking it down the sewer. As the show went on, it seemed that its writer actually had a grudge against TV viewers--mocking them, insulting them, belittling them, in the worst display of fear-need avoidance co-dependency ever. Every character became a tool, and especially a tool for tool's sake. End the series already.

(And Sorkin, next time get over your former girlfriends on your own time! Somebody should give Kristin Chenoweth a bleedin' medal!)

posted at February 20, 2007 11:15 PM

Mary Beth - Chicago wrote:

This show has potential. I agree with everything Dottie said. Amanda Peet is not my favorite but she is growing on me. I'd like to see where this show goes. Please don't cancel it yet.

posted at February 20, 2007 11:15 PM

Serge wrote:

I am not watching the "Black Donnellys" and invite everybody who loves "Studio 60" to do the same. NBC needs to see that the timeslot is just fine for "Studio 60". If NBC needed a spot for "Donnellys", they should have removed the low quality "Las Vegas" or the outdated "e.r." instead.

posted at February 21, 2007 12:10 AM

tv viewer wrote:

Studio 60 is a whole lot better and smarter than Ugly Betty. Hello? Is anyone actually watching TV anymore? All of this season's great shows got the can because they didn't pull in a #1 slot. Isn't third in ratings good enough? What happened to shows lasting at least a full season? And what will go into the cancelled show's place? Likely the second-string ideas attempting to make a first-string slot. What happened to "Windfall" and "Heist" and "Conviction"? "Daybreak" and "3lbs." were a whole lot better than 30 Rock and all of the lame reality shows. The only reality show I can handle is "Grease" and that's only because I went to high school with Chad. I can't think of much worse television with a lack of creativity greater than "American Idol." Come on America, what happened?

posted at February 21, 2007 12:56 AM

Sue wrote:

I just wanted to add my two cents about this show. The show itself is a good show but there is just too darn much time spent on the breakup of a couple we can't possibly really care about since we weren't privy to their personal relationship in the first place. We weren't there when they were together and a show with flash backs just doesn't do it for me personally. I don't care about Matt and Harriett as a couple or non-couple. Too much time is spent on them. I can't get involved with the trouble Matt is having over the breakup. I don't care. I would be disappointed to see the show go. I really like the characters and the premise of the show, but I'm always left with the feeling that the show is about Matt and Harriett. Get over them already!!

posted at February 21, 2007 08:36 AM

Dan wrote:

Sometimes when shows don't get the viewers, we pay. Problem is that they don't account for DVR/Tivo users. This show has some great moments and it is perfectly cast. Two words for you and this will all seem like Deja vu....Arrested Development!

posted at February 21, 2007 09:13 AM

unicornDFW wrote:

This show is for the sharp, witty, intellectually-minded - please tell me that there are enough of us out there to keep this show on the air. I don't know if The Black Donnellys is going to be any good, but why pull Studio 60 completely-why not move it to another time slot where it might compete better, like 7pm (8pmET). Prison Break on Fox doesn't appeal to everyone and I am sick of Deal or No Deal on NBC. But I guess that show must be getting a large share of viewers which gets the ratings which gets the advertisers, and we all know it's about the bottom line which is the almighty dollar, not quality - and that's too bad. I hate to see Studio 60 lose because there are more average viewers than intelligent ones.

posted at February 21, 2007 12:19 PM

Craig wrote:

S60 is one of the best new shows and I'm really disappointed to see it gone starting next week. Ofcourse it isn't going to get the ratings the studio expects. They don't promote the show near enough and the ratings don't reflect the time-shift audience that DVR's the show for later viewing. Finally NBC has a sleugh of great shows and what do they do? Toss one out the window when it's just picking up good momentum. The show has so many opportunities ahead it would be a shame not to see it come back. Shame on you NBC for not supporting the show you yourselves touted as the best show of the fall line-up. The show has a solid audience of loyal and devoted fans. Not to mention the classy wit and great cast. Don't blow it NBC, do the right thing.

posted at February 21, 2007 01:31 PM

nancy wrote:

I have read so many reviews about what is wrong with Studio 60 and I tend to agree with the consensus-(sketch comedy not working bored of Sarah Paulson etc.)
But to me the reason I can't get into it is simple. It is just too much like the West Wing without being the West Wing (or nearly as good.) It has the same great writing and dialogue, Bradley Whitford, the same dark moody lighting, it even uses the same type face for the credits. Just enough to make you hunger for the West Wing that we loved so much but then were faced with story-lines about prime-time television treated s though its life and death drama. Its just hard to take seriously. It comes off superficial and trite compared with Sorkin's previous productions. And its just too hard not to compare them.
Maybe if there had been a little more time between West Wing and 60 it would have been easier not to compare them and we would have hungered a little more for return of the Sorkin magic but one season later its like hanging a great painting next to 2nd generation photocopy of itself. All it does is remind you how good the original was.

posted at February 21, 2007 03:48 PM

Tom wrote:

Let's face it. When it comes to television, three words rule. RATINGS, RATINGS, RATINGS. However, NBC execs may have done a quick hip shot on Studio 60 without really investigating it. If there is any truth to the fact that it was one of the highest TIVO'd shows, then that would suggest to me NBC failed to follow the rules of those three other words..... LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION. It may turn out that the time slot and lead in were all wrong for a show like Studio 60.
Message to NBC Execs, follow these 6 words.....
SAVE STUDIO SIXTY, SAVE THE NETWORK

posted at February 21, 2007 04:09 PM

joseph chimenti wrote:

I wish the networks would stop taking shows off of the air without really giving them a chance. They move things around so much it becomes confusing as to when they are moved, why they are moved and when they will come back. One of my favorite shows that I thought had great cast, writing and really good values was the Geena Davis show about the woman President. Maybe I am getting old and out of touch but I remember when Cagney and Lacey was puleed and then put back on and ran for another 5 years. Give things a chance guys.

posted at February 21, 2007 06:38 PM

Lisa wrote:

I'm heart-broken. In the day and age of "reality tv" isn't there room for one show with beautiful dialogue? Please NBC, save this show!

posted at February 21, 2007 07:05 PM

Courtney wrote:

I love Studio 60 and think Sorkin is amazing. Bravo should pick it up. I think it would do well with a smaller more specific audience that appreciates great writing

posted at February 21, 2007 07:56 PM

Liz wrote:

Hrm....I look at this and then remember the wonderful days of West Wing. During the first season, I do believe a lot of people were saying "this is never going to be picked up, it's too smart". Yet, it did because of the twists and turns of the plot line along the fact of Zoey and Charlie and everything else. We did have to wait til the later part of the first season to get to that.

What I'm trying to say here is that we need to calm down and realize that fluff needs to be shown to get to the good parts. We need to go through the motions of the romance and the drugs before we'll get to the level that we want it to be at. Sorkin's first seasons are the ones that have the rocky starts. The second seasons and the ones after that (even though he left West Wing in the third/fourth season) are the ones that pick up and make us really think. Yeah, it sucks that we have to wait, but patience will bring so many results. I do hope that either NBC saves it or they take it to Bravo who needs the show during all of it's reality tv crap (minus Top Design and Real Housewives *grins*). I think this show would have thrived on HBO or another cable network where we understand the slowness and the rocks of shows and give it a bit of time. That's all that really needs to be done here: give it time.

posted at February 22, 2007 01:01 PM

Vinnie wrote:

How could Bravo pick it up? They could never afford it. And they do cheesy reality shows, not scripted dramas. You'll be lucky to catch those unaired episodes on DVD. The ratings are too low for NBC.

posted at February 22, 2007 01:42 PM

Darlene wrote:

NBC always has to mess up a good thing. Studio 60, like Sports Night & West Wing before it, is an intelligent show that is written brilliantly and performed by a very talented ensemble cast. Please don't let NBC get away with killing another excellent show. Sign this petition:
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/Save-NBC-Studio-60

Don't forget to also let NBC know how you feel:
http://www.nbc.com/Footer/Contact_Us/

posted at February 22, 2007 01:43 PM

Moral_Bankruptcy wrote:

I've pointed this out before, but I think it's worth repeating: Many fans of Aaron Sorkin's shows and many critics call people stupid if they don't like his shows. I really don't think that's the problem. I watched the pilot and half of the second episode before I tuned out permanently and it wasn't because it was going over my head. My feeling at the time was I've seen this before, it was done much better, and I really didn't feel like listening to the characters telling me how smart they were. The issues they were discussing (art vs. commerce, the cultural influences of the Christian right, etc.) were not handled in a way that was interesting, amusing or original. Mostly, I'm just tired of the rapid-fire dialogue style of Sorkin's that mistakes speed of delivery for real wit. Watching people give long speeches telling us their integrity requires them to do what was funny, then reminding us that they are the best comedy writers in the world, and then saying or doing absolutely nothing funny throughout the show made for an excrutiating viewing experience. When the comedy isn't funny, characters who keep telling you how funny they are just seem arrogant and pretentious. I'm sitting there annoyed that everybody keeps acting like they're geniuses when the best comedy they can come up with is a high-school quality parody of Gilbert & Sullivan. Add to that the artificial manner in which all Sorkin characters speak--I defy anyone to name a person who talks that way--and the whole experience is highly alienating and dreadfully dull. Throwing in a few cultural references that made it clear that the writer had taken some lit classes did nothing to make this show stimulating in any way.

Ultimately, here's the real problem--this was a show written by television writers that was supposed to convince us that television writers are wonderful and that television writing is the most important thing in the world. Blecccccccch!

posted at February 24, 2007 09:16 AM

SherryK wrote:

I love this show! I agree with people who said NBC have not promoted it enough. I have friends who had never even heard of it until I talked about it.

posted at February 24, 2007 01:09 PM

beth wrote:

i like studio 60

it is a good way to start the week

i like looking for the similarties between west wing and studio 60

i hope it stays on TV

posted at February 24, 2007 06:02 PM

G. Griffith wrote:

As usual, a brilliant, intelligent, and compelling show is on the chopping block while shows that cater to a morons thrive? Is America that dumb? Why can't good shows be given a chance? There are actually some of us out there who enjoy these kinds of shows. The Nine was just getting started and they killed it. Last year, Sci Fi Shows like Surface and Invasion got us hooked and strung us along all year only to be cancelled without the benefit of a final ending to tie up loose ends and give its loyal fans closure. Mainstream networks complain that they are losing viewers to cable. They are losing viewers because they have no respect for them. KEEP STUDIO 60 ON THE AIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

posted at February 25, 2007 10:38 AM

Tracie wrote:

While I LOVE S60, my friends and I all knew that it would not last. The main reason? Ratings. I work in broadcasting, and many of my co-workers love this show and watch it faithfully. The only problem is that people in broadcasting can't participate in Nielsen ratings. So I'm betting that a large segement of the S60 audience isn't being counted. And that's a shame. It's a great show and I think once it is allowed to hit its stride (as well as maybe move to a new timeslot) it will do well.

posted at February 26, 2007 10:31 PM

Lois wrote:

Why is it that the more intellegent shows are always cancelled while the crap just goes on and on.
Please keep Studio 60 and let those of us who appreciate intellegent, fast paced humor with just the right touch of drama, enjoy something on television.

Keep Studio 60 and let intellegent people have something to watch.

posted at February 28, 2007 07:20 PM

JD wrote:

It's time to face reality. Shows like Studio 60 are just too smart for this country and the lowest-common-denominator network execs.

posted at March 4, 2007 04:38 AM

bob wrote:

I found studio 60 to be a well written, well acted, and extremely entertaining. I am getting fed up with some of the crap we are served on t.v. and it makes me angry that they would pull a show that is actually watchable! I have no interest in watching ghe black donnellys and i feel that it will just degenerate into another poorly wwritten, poorly acted piece of crap! Will the the major networks ever give any consideration to providing programming that isn't directed at the lowest common denominator?

posted at March 7, 2007 03:33 PM

Kat wrote:

I signed up to 3 different blogs so I could post my love for Studio 60, something I'd NEVER done before. I don't watch much tv - mostly because it's all the same cookie cutter formats. Studio 60 is different, a smart show, fast paced comical entity that catches your attention and draws you in for more... It's just really good and I wish the knuckle heads at NBC would just move it. It'll find (and keep) an audience. It's a sleeper, that's for sure, but once it's audience catches up w/ it, it'll be on for a long time and in reruns for a long time. The market value may not look good now, but the smart people love it and we're very loyal. It's prove it's worth, just give it time.

posted at March 19, 2007 07:48 PM

EVELYN wrote:

I SO AGREE THAT THIS SHOW SHOULD BE KEPT ON, AND I WAS SO HAPPY TO FIND IT ON THIS SITE. I KNEW I WASN'T WRONG. I AGREE THAT IT SHOULD BE ON HBO. THE "BIG THREE" NETWORKS ARE NOT WORTHY. IT WAS IRONY THAT SORKIN WROTE THE SHOW ABOUT THE KID WANTING TO SELL HIS SHOW TO CABLE AND BEING TALKED OUT OF IT.. THIS SHOW WILL THRIVE ON HBO AND SORKIN CAN DO SO MUCH MORE WITH IT. NBC IS A POS!!!! UNDESERVING OF HIS BRILLANCE.

posted at March 23, 2007 08:35 AM

marzmarz wrote:

AFTER READING THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS, I DECIDED TO ADD MY VIEW: I ABSOLUTELY LOVE STUDIO 60 (SORKIN/SCHLAMME ARE BRILLIANT!). IF I SEE ANOTHER "REALITY" SHOW ADVERTISED, I WILL THROW MY TELE OUT THE WINDOW! (I MAY JUST DO THAT IF S60 GETS CANCELLED). I AM SO CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING SOMETHING WITH A LITTLE HIGHER FOG INDEX THAN FREAKIN' 'DEAL OR NO DEAL'. MOVE S60 TO A DIFFERENT TIMESLOT...WED AT 10 WORKS FOR ME.

posted at March 26, 2007 12:30 AM

NoMoreStudio60! wrote:

Hey MrSkippy24, thanx for your shout-out, but you just comfirmed my opinion of this crap when you said "a little less romance would be ok" well, THATS the main prob! And dont start dissing this great country for our views! Why, cause most of us agree that the Iraq war is good to get rid of the bad guy terrorists? And dont DARE insult my fav comedy, Til Death, which has funnier serious parts than Studio 60 has for its so called jokes? And F.Y.I.-its spelled TRAVESTY! Have a Happy Easter Y'all!

posted at April 8, 2007 02:20 PM